Keywords
peat
magnetostratigraphy
relative paleointensity
excursion
Section
Abstract
The paper considers the possibility of determining the age and correlating peat sections by solving the inverse problem of magnetostratigraphy based on the findings of comprehensive (palaeomagnetic, petromagnetic, microprobe, and radiocarbon) studies on peats of the «Tyapka» and «Chlya» peat sections in the Lower Amur region. For this purpose, we used the values of relative paleointensity calculated following the technique described by Bagina-Petrova. There is no difference in the rate of magnetization fixation among studied peat samples, and the age of magnetization is comparable to the age of the peat deposits itself. The solution of the inverse problem of magnetostratigraphy using the values of relative paleointensity can be used to correlate peat sections among themselves and to estimate the rate of peat accumulation in different periods of the Holocene, even in the absence of radiocarbon dating for one of the correlated sections.
References
Вагнер Г.А. Научные методы датирования в геологии, археологии и истории. М.: Техносфера, 2006. 576 с. [Vagner G.A. Nauchnye metody datirovaniya v geologii, arheologii i istorii. Moscow: Tekhnosfera, 2006. 576 p. (in Russian)].
Микишин Ю.А., Петренко Т.И., Гвоздева И.Г., Разова Г.Г. Стратиграфия отложений пятиметровой террасы озера Чля // Палинология Востока СССР. Владивосток. 1987. С. 94–101 [Mikishin Yu.A., Petrenko T.I., Gvozdeva I.G., Razova G.G. Stratigrafiya otlozhenij pyatimetrovoj terrasy ozera Chlya // Palinologiya Vostoka SSSR. Vladivostok. 1987. P. 94–101 (in Russian)].
Начасова И.Е., Акимова С.В. Вариации напряженности геомагнитного поля на Пиренейском п-ове в последние тысячелетия // Физика Земли. 2015. № 5. С. 100–106. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0002333715050087 [Nachasova I.E., Akimova S.V. The geomagnetic field intensity variations in the Iberian Peninsula during the last millennium // Izvestiya, Physics of the solid earth. 2015. V. 51. № 5. P. 709–715. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351315050080].
Песков А.Ю., Диденко А.Н., Каретников А.С. и др. Торфяные отложения как новый источник палеомагнитной записи в голоцене на примере экскурса «Этруссия» // Доклады Российской академии наук. Науки о Земле. 2023. Т. 512. № 1. С. 127–137. https://doi.org/0.31857/S2686739723600583 [Peskov A.Yu., Didenko A.N., Karetnikov A.S. et al. Peat deposits as a new source of paleomagnetic records in the holocene as exemplified by the Etrussia excursion // Doklady Earth Sciences. 2023. V. 512. № 1. P. 878–886. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1028334x23601037].
Песков А.Ю., Крутикова В.О., Захарченко Е.Н. и др. Геохимия и магнетизм торфяников междуречья рек Хор и Кия, Сихотэ-Алинь (предварительные данные) // Тихоокеанская геология. 2020. Т. 39. № 2. С. 79–89. https://doi.org/10.30911/0207-4028-2020-39-2-79-89 [Peskov A.Y., Krutikova V.O., Karetnikov A.S. et al. Geochemistry and magnetism of peat deposits in the Khor-Kiya interfluve, Sikhote-Alin (preliminary results) // Russian Journal of Pacific Geology. 2020. Т. 14. № 2. С. 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1819714020020050].
Петрова Г.Н., Багина О.А. О безнагревном методе определения напряженности древнего геомагнитного поля // Известия АН СССР. Физика Земли. 1976. № 4. С. 54–62 [Petrova G.N., Bagina O.A. O beznagrevnom metode opredeleniya napryazhennosti drevnego geomagnitnogo polya // Izvestiya AN SSSR. Fizika Zemli, 1976. № 4. P. 54–62 (in Russian)].
Печерский Д.М. Петромагнетизм и палеомагнетизм. М.: Наука, 1985. 128 с. [Pecherskij D.M. Petromagnetizm i paleomagnetizm. Moscow: Nauka, 1985. 128 p. (in Russian)].
Batt C.M., Brown M.C., Clelland S.-J. et al. Advances in archaeomagnetic dating in Britain: New data, new approaches and a new calibration curve // Journal of Archaeological Science. 2017. V. 85. P. 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.07.002
Bertea C.M., Narayana R., Agliassa C. et al. Geomagnetic Field (Gmf) and Plant Evolution: Investigating the Effects of Gmf Reversal on Arabidopsis thaliana Development and Gene Expression // Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2015. (105). e53286. doi: 10.3791/53286
Chou Y.-M., Jiang X., Liu Q. et al. Multidecadally Resolved Polarity Oscillations during a Geomagnetic Excursion // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018. V. 115 (36). P. 8913–8918. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720404115
De Marco E., Spatharas V., Goґmez-Paccard M. et al. New archaeointensity results from archaeological sites and variation of the geomagnetic field intensity for the last 7 millennia in Greece // Physics and Chemistry of the Earth. 2008. V. 33 (6). P. 578–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2008.02.025
Dergachev V.A., Raspopov O.M., Geel B., Zaitseva G.I. The ‘Sterno-Etrussia’ geomagnetic excursion around 2700 BP and changes of solar activity, cosmic ray intensity, and climate // Radiocarbon. 2004. V. 46. Iss. 2. Р. 661−681. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200035724
Jacobs J.A. Reversals of the Earth’s Magnetic Field / Cambridge, New York, Port Chester, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press., 1994. 346 p.
Schilman B., Bar-Matthews M., Almogi-Labin A., Luz B. Global climate instability reflected by eastern Mediterranean marine records during the Late Holocene // Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2001. V. 176. Iss. 1–4. P. 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(01)00336-4
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 А.Ю. Песков, А.Н. Диденко, А.С. Каретников, М.А. Климин, А.И. Тихомирова, М.В. Архипов, Н.В. Кожемяко